Filter
- Basel 3.1 19
- Brexit 1
- CRR2 8
- Capital 1
- Consultation Paper 2
- Covid 1
- Dear CEO Letter - PRA 1
- Dear CRO Letter - PRA 1
- Deposit Aggregators 2
- ICAAP 3
- ILAAP 2
- IRRBB 4
- Internal news 1
- Large Exposures 1
- Liquidity Risk 4
- Market Updates 1
- Model Risk Management 1
- Own Funds 2
- Policy Statements 1
- RRP 1
- Recovery Planning 1
- Regulatory reporting automation 2
- Regulatory reporting transformation 3
- Regulatory updates 32
- Risk Management 1
- Risk management framework 7
- Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDT) 3
- Solvent Exit Analysis 2
- Solvent Exit Plan 2
- Stress testing 3
- Supervisory Statement 3
- Webinar 2
- k-ALM 4
Stress Signals: What the 2025 Capital Test Means for Small- and Medium-sized Banks
With the Bank of England’s 2025 Bank Capital Stress Test now in motion, small and medium-sized banks should take note. While only the large banks participate directly, it is nonetheless of interest for other firms as they approach their next stress testing exercise. The latest publications bring stress parameters up to date from the 2024 Desk-based Stress Test, and some elements have changed. This article explores what banks can take away from the latest stress programme and how to reflect those developments in their own risk management processes.
PRA’s 2024 ICAAP Stress Test Scenarios for Non-Systemic Banks
On 27th June 2024, the Prudential Regulation Authority (“PRA”) published the ICAAP Scenarios for non-systemic UK banks, which are the supply shock scenario and the demand shock scenario. This article summarises the key factors of the scenarios and provides specific points on how small- and medium-sized banks should approach there stress testing design processes, with relation to the 2024 ICAAP Scenarios.
ICAAP, Pillar 2A and Pillar 2B
The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) is the process in which the Board and management of the bank oversees and regularly assesses key financial and capital related aspects of the bank.